October 13, 2020
8 Minute Read

Polesaver: Evidence of Success in Preventing Utility Pole Failure

Polesaver dual barrier technology sleeves are a proven and independently tested product. With 25 years of volume use and over 20 years of independent field test data Polesaver is a proven and highly cost-effective means of increasing pole life.

With over 30 years of volume use and over 25 years of independent field test data, Polesaver Rot-Guard barrier sleeves offer a proven and highly cost-effective way to maximise pole life. In this article, we explore the effects of moisture, fungi and termites on sleeved and un-sleeved test samples and poles. These independent test results demonstrate the clear benefits of Polesaver's Rot-Guard product when used in conjunction with existing wood preservatives.

Rot-Guard protected pole

All of the factors necessary for wood decay are present in the upper 20cm (8″) of the ground. This section is the most common point of failure for utility poles and is also the most mechanically stressed. To prevent decay, moisture and wood-decaying organisms must be kept out and wood preservative must be retained. The Rot-Guard total barrier sleeve creates an air and watertight seal to achieve this. This unique dual barrier technology has the potential to significantly reduce remediation costs and improve grid hardening, reliability and safety. 

The evidence of Polesaver's success is documented in independent test data and standards with no reported failures to date. Rot-Guard sleeves comply with:

  • European Standard EN252: 1989, ‘Field test method for determining the relative protective effectiveness of a wood preservative in ground contact’. “20 years of test data
  • ENV807 Wood preservatives. ‘Determination of the effectiveness against soft rotting micro-fungi and other soil-inhabiting micro-organisms’.
  • AWPA E1-97 (American Wood-Protection Association): 2005.’ The standard method for laboratory evaluation to determine resistance to subterranean termites’.
  • Meet the requirements of AWPA standard. ‘Barrier systems’ P20-13, BP-1.
  • Large scale field pole test by a utility at three pole test sites. 

Pole moisture content is a catalyst for decay, over time wetting and drying cycles can result in leaching and the subsequent reduction in the concentration of wood preservatives, leaving wood vulnerable to decay. If the moisture level of the timber is higher than 25%, the potential for decay increases which is a precursor to pole failure. During an Accelerated decay test (ENV807), a Rot-Guard protected sample showed less than 25% moisture content at the critical ground-line level after 48 weeks. In direct comparison, an unprotected sample showed levels of saturation higher than 150% in the same area. As decay set in, the respective samples experienced weight loss due to decay. The Rot-Guard protected sample showed no deterioration in the sleeved zone and no weight loss.

In contrast, the unprotected timber showed between 30-40% weight loss at the critical ground-line level. Furthermore, an independent 20-year field test (EN252) using Scots pine sapwood stakes showed that some unprotected samples failed after just eight years. In contrast, all of the Rot-Guard protected stakes showed no signs of decay after 20 years. Thanks to its air and watertight seal, the Polesaver Rot-Guard total barrier protection system excludes moisture, fungi and other wood-decaying organisms from the timber. 

Graph showing loss of pole strength over time due to decay
Graph showing loss of pole strength over time due to decay

In 2012 Polesaver was approached by a large U.K. based utility who were assessing alternative preservative options with growing uncertainty around the use of creosote. The utility established a programme to evaluate alternative solutions and identify the most suitable option to match the service life of creosote-treated poles. Having already experienced issues with ground-line decay in poles treated with waterborne copper preservatives, they wanted to explore the use of barrier sleeves as a potential solution to offer additional protection. Having evaluated the available options in detail, the utility recognised potential risks associated with certain systems, including wet band decay at the upper edge of partial barrier systems. To independently verify the performance of a full barrier sleeve system and establish whether this risk could be avoided, the utility initiated pole trials at three test sites across the UK.

The trials aimed to monitor moisture content at ground level and at the top of the sleeve across four pole configurations:

  • Water-based copper-treated poles fitted with a Polesaver full barrier sleeve.
  • Creosote-treated poles, used as the benchmark.
  • Water-based copper-treated poles.
  • Water-based copper-treated poles fitted with a partial bag-type barrier sleeve.

The three locations across the U.K. incorporated a variety of conditions including poles set in tarmac, wet and boggy soils with a water table around 20cm (8″) and drier ground. A time period of four years elapsed before measurements were taken, this was to allow moisture levels to reach equilibrium. Moisture content levels were taken across all samples using a calibrated pin type moisture meter with pins inserted to a depth of 6mm. The creosote-treated poles had an average moisture content of 26% just above the ground-line. The poles treated with water-based copper-based wood preservative had an average moisture content of 32% (>50% at the start of the test) just above the ground-line. The poles treated with water-based copper-based wood preservative and fitted with a partial bag type barrier sleeve had an average moisture content of 43% just above the top of the bag (>50% at the start of the test). The poles treated with water-based copper-based wood preservative fitted with a Polesaver Rot-Guard full barrier sleeve had an average moisture content of 20% just above the top of the sleeve ( >50% at the start of the test). The test results show that a pole fitted with a Polesaver Rot-Guard sleeve was most effective at reducing moisture content in this part of the pole over time.

British Telecom/Open reach Polesaver test site showing the installation of Polesaver protected samples and non protected samples
British Telecom/Open reach Polesaver test site

Polesaver Rot-Guard sleeves provide an effective barrier against wood decay and offer additional protection against termite attack. This has been demonstrated through testing conducted by Mississippi State University, which evaluated the response of termites to protected and unprotected wood.

The study used ten wood cubes, both coated with Polesaver Rot-Guard and uncoated, and conducted two tests. In the first, termites were given a choice between protected and unprotected timber. The results showed that the termites did not feed on the Rot-Guard-protected wood. In the second test, the termites were offered only Rot-Guard-protected wood, with no alternative food source available. Again, no feeding was observed, indicating that the Polesaver Rot-Guard barrier deterred termite feeding under the test conditions.

Termites are generally attracted to decaying wood, which is easier to digest than sound timber. By preventing decay at the ground-line, Polesaver Rot-Guard sleeves can therefore help reduce the conditions that make timber attractive to termites, providing an additional layer of protection against attack.

Termites which eat wooden utility poles

Our test data has provided the information we need to calculate the expected lifespan of a treated pole with a Polesaver Rot-Guard sleeve. Based on our 25-year field test, stakes dip treated with wood preservative started to fail after eight years. The test samples protected by Polesaver Rot-Guards showed zero failures since being on test and remained strong at the 25-year point. From this, we can calculate a minimum pole life increase factor when using Polesaver Rot-Guards. If we take a total test time frame of 20 years and divide it by the length of time it took an unprotected pole to fail (eight years), we achieve a minimum pole life extension factor of X 2.5. Assuming a pole lifespan of 20 years for a standard treated pole, we can by calculation conclude that a Polesaver protected preservative-treated pole should have a  minimum expected pole life of 20 x 2.5 = 50 years. If you are interested in seeing any of the test data, then please go to the downloads section or send us an email and we will send it to you.

If this life extension is to be achieved, it is critical that the sleeve also continues to provide a barrier to the causes of decay for 50 years or more. Polesaver Rot-Guard sleeves are made from high-quality materials which have a proven long term track record when used as in-ground barriers. The film material used to produce the barrier is highly U.V. stabilised and has been in use in critical in-ground barrier applications for over 60 years without problems. The thermoplastic meltable liner also has a proven long term track record for both in-ground and timber protection applications.

It is this data that allows us to offer a 50-year sleeve guarantee with confidence. 

In the next blog article, we will be looking at the financial case for using barrier sleeve products. In the meantime, for those of you in Europe who currently use Creosote treated poles, we will be posting a short blog giving an update on changes and a brief look at the alternative options.

LEARN MORE

TOTAL POLE PROTECTION

From durable fire fabric, to outstanding protection against rot and termites, Polesaver products are tested and trusted to deliver unbeatable pole protection.
Share

FEATURED Articles

Image showing core rot in a wooden utility pole
Featured
October 15, 2019

Utility Pole Rot: Understanding Core Rot, Shell Rot and Prevention

Understanding how rot develops, where it affects a pole's strength and how deterioration can be prevented is essential for utilities looking to maintain network safety and extend infrastructure service life.
Roadside power poles, Washington State, U.S.
Featured
March 13, 2026

How U.S. Utilities Can Protect Infrastructure & Boost ROI

Discover how Rot-Guard and Blaze-Guard can help U.S. utilities maximise pole life, reduce fire risk, and protect infrastructure investments.
Featured
May 16, 2022

What Are The Alternatives To Penta wood Preservative?

In this short article, we run through the alternatives to Pentachlorophenol wood preservative and how you can use them in conjunction with a full barrier system to prevent decay and increase pole life by +20 years from the start.
Ready to Get in Touch?
Polesaver manufactures and supplies guaranteed products that are proven to maximise utility pole lifespan. With millions of Rot-Guard sleeves supplied to date, our patented ground-line barrier sleeves have been proven in volume use since 1994.
Contact Us
Connect With Us
Copyright © 2026 Polesaver. All rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy

*Polesaver uses long term independent test data on the effectiveness of barrier sleeves and fire protection fabric to reach all the conclusions given on this website (test data available on request). Based on this data, Polesaver believes longer life, maintenance of strength over time, improved safety and reliability, extended inspection periods and reduced maintenance requirements are reasonable claims. This is subject to Polesaver products being correctly applied as per our instructions and used on correctly preservative treated (for long term in-ground use - Use Class 4 or higher) wooden utility poles that are free of decay at the time of sleeve application. The claims made, real or implied are not warranties. It is the responsibility of the user to evaluate and satisfy themselves that the performance of the product meets their specific safety, reliability, extended inspection, repair and any other performance or cost-benefit criteria before using Polesaver sleeves or fire protection fabric.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

crossmenuarrow-right